Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, is entering 2025 with sweeping changes that signal a bold new direction. From altering its approach to content moderation to heavily integrating AI-powered features and facing potential regulatory challenges, the company is switching gears in the wake of the new U.S. administration.
But what does this mean for users, influencers, and advertisers? Let’s dive into the details.
In a significant policy shift, Meta announced it would replace its independent fact-checking system with a Community Notes feature inspired by X (formerly Twitter). CEO Mark Zuckerberg framed the change as an effort to restore “free expression” on Meta’s platforms. This decision coincides with the appointment of Joel Kaplan, a Republican strategist, as Meta’s new global affairs chief—a move that aligns with the interests of the upcoming U.S. administration.
Previously, Meta had taken steps to distance itself from political content, relegating sensitive topics like immigration and gender to opt-in settings on Instagram and Threads. Now, those restrictions are being lifted. By removing independent content moderation, Meta’s platforms could become breeding grounds for heated debates—or worse, unmoderated misinformation and rage bait.
Community Notes aim to counteract misinformation by crowdsourcing annotations from users with diverse perspectives. However, as reports from outlets like The Washington Post highlight, this approach has significant flaws. Achieving consensus on contentious political topics is unlikely, leaving many notes unpublished. With critical issues like immigration, LGBTQIA+ rights, and elections at stake, critics warn that the shift could erode trust and foster polarization.
Meta is facing backlash from regulators due to its shift in moderation towards Community Notes. German politicians, including chancellor candidate Friedrich Merz, are pushing for stricter oversight of Meta’s activities in the European Union, warning that such changes could increase the spread of harmful content and misinformation.
Worst case, this could lead to EU regulations mirroring the U.S. approach to a possible TikTok ban, which would impose significant constraints on platforms like Meta. In the U.S., a TikTok ban appears imminent, presenting both opportunities and challenges for Meta’s dominance in the short-form video market.
A TikTok ban could drive users and advertisers toward Instagram and Facebook’s short-form video features, such as Reels. However, this influx might also intensify regulatory scrutiny, as policymakers examine whether Meta is capitalizing on its market dominance at the expense of competition and user safety.
Aside from Meta's changes in moderation, it is pushing for more AI integration into its apps. Two new features especially have sparked a debate:
Meta recently launched AI-generated profiles intended to enhance user engagement, only to take them offline a few hours later following widespread public backlash. These profiles were criticized for masquerading as members of marginalized communities, which many argued undermined the visibility of actual marginalized creators. This approach sparked outrage, with users accusing Meta of prioritizing superficial inclusivity over genuine representation. Read more about Facebook's AI challenges here.
Meta AI is generating imagery of certain users based on their selfies and photos and displaying these creations on their personal timelines. This move aims to showcase its generative AI engine and drive interest in its tools. While innovative, this rollout has raised questions about whether users genuinely want AI-generated content to dominate their social feeds.
Meta's jump to AI reflects a larger trend of adopting new AI tools and technologies, but it currently leaves human content creators out of the equation.
Critics argue that Meta's approach to AI could erode the fundamental concept of social media by making it less social, turning timelines into showcases for AI-generated artifacts rather than genuine human interaction. This shift could also complicate the ability of human users and advertisers to identify and connect with their real, human target audiences.
In the end, we're still far from widespread AI adoption, so platforms, advertisers, and users should proceed with caution. While some users embrace AI tools for the ease they offer in content creation, others vehemently oppose their use. This divide has sparked significant user movements, such as the backlash against X (formerly Twitter) when it announced plans to train AI models using user-posted images, prompting many artists to migrate to alternative platforms.
Critics frequently point to the risks of AI-generated content, including the spread of misinformation through faked images—a recurring issue on platforms like Facebook. Additionally, creative communities and their advocates remain vocal in their opposition, often organizing boycotts of AI-endorsing platforms and products. This movement has given rise to alternative platforms like Cara or Bluesky.
Meta’s recent changes signify a major pivot from its previous strategy. By embracing Community Notes, lifting content restrictions, and integrating AI profiles and content, the company is reshaping its platforms amidst significant controversy. While these changes aim to align with trends and new regulatory landscapes, they raise critical questions about user experience, misinformation, and inclusivity.
Adapting to these shifts will be essential for influencers, users, and advertisers. Human connection, authenticity, and ethical responsibility may become the cornerstones of successful engagement in this evolving digital landscape. As Meta ventures further into the realm of AI and regulatory scrutiny, its ability to balance innovation with its social responsibility will determine the future of its platforms and its role in the digital ecosystem.
Connect with our team at Audiencly! We’ll help you navigate the complex social media landscape and craft optimized influencer marketing strategies that truly resonate with your audience.
